Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to South San Francisco
This post compares Banning, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 68% | 33% |
| Black | 9% | 2% |
| Asian | 5% | 39% |
| With Kids | 25% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 36% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or South San Francisco?
A: Banning has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 30824 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Banning versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z