Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to San Francisco
This post compares Banning, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $927,400 |
| White | 68% | 47% |
| Black | 9% | 5% |
| Asian | 5% | 34% |
| With Kids | 25% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 38 |
| Rentals | 36% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or San Francisco?
A: Banning has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 30824 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Banning versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z