Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to San Bruno
This post compares Banning, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $754,700 |
| White | 68% | 49% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 5% | 28% |
| With Kids | 25% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 36% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or San Bruno?
A: Banning has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 30824 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Banning versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z