Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to Riverbank
This post compares Banning, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $247,200 |
| White | 68% | 79% |
| Black | 9% | 0% |
| Asian | 5% | 4% |
| With Kids | 25% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 32 |
| Rentals | 36% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or Riverbank?
A: Banning has a larger population count than Riverbank: 30824 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Banning does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Banning versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z