Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Banning, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $444,200 |
| White | 68% | 62% |
| Black | 9% | 9% |
| Asian | 5% | 13% |
| With Kids | 25% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 35 |
| Rentals | 36% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Banning has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 30824 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Banning versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z