Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to Pico Rivera
This post compares Banning, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $380,200 |
| White | 68% | 55% |
| Black | 9% | 0% |
| Asian | 5% | 3% |
| With Kids | 25% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 36 |
| Rentals | 36% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or Pico Rivera?
A: Banning has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 30824 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Banning does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Banning versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z