Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to Foothill Farms
This post compares Banning, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $201,200 |
| White | 68% | 67% |
| Black | 9% | 9% |
| Asian | 5% | 5% |
| With Kids | 25% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
| Rentals | 36% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or Foothill Farms?
A: Banning has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 30824 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Banning versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z