Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to Fairfield
This post compares Banning, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $341,500 |
| White | 68% | 46% |
| Black | 9% | 14% |
| Asian | 5% | 17% |
| With Kids | 25% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 34 |
| Rentals | 36% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or Fairfield?
A: Banning has a much smaller population count than Fairfield: 30824 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Banning versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z