Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to Chino Hills
This post compares Banning, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $567,200 |
| White | 68% | 46% |
| Black | 9% | 4% |
| Asian | 5% | 33% |
| With Kids | 25% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 38 |
| Rentals | 36% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or Chino Hills?
A: Banning has a much smaller population count than Chino Hills: 30824 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Banning does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Banning versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z