Compare-Cities.com
Compare Banning to Baldwin Park
This post compares Banning, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Banning (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,824 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $32,861 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $197,500 | $357,500 |
| White | 68% | 34% |
| Black | 9% | 2% |
| Asian | 5% | 18% |
| With Kids | 25% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
| Rentals | 36% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Banning or Baldwin Park?
A: Banning has a much smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 30824 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Banning or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Banning.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Banning or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Banning.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Banning versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Banning may include: Hemet, Yucca-Valley, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z