Compare-Cities.com
Compare Baldwin Park to South Pasadena
This post compares Baldwin Park, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Baldwin Park (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,572 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $31,956 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $357,500 | $928,500 |
| White | 34% | 54% |
| Black | 2% | 3% |
| Asian | 18% | 29% |
| With Kids | 48% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Baldwin Park or South Pasadena?
A: Baldwin Park has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 76572 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Baldwin Park or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Baldwin Park.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Baldwin Park or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Baldwin Park.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Baldwin Park versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Baldwin Park may include: La-Puente, Montclair, and Norwalk.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z