Compare-Cities.com
Compare Baldwin Park to San Francisco
This post compares Baldwin Park, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Baldwin Park (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,572 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $31,956 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $357,500 | $927,400 |
| White | 34% | 47% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 18% | 34% |
| With Kids | 48% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 38 |
| Rentals | 43% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Baldwin Park or San Francisco?
A: Baldwin Park has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 76572 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Baldwin Park or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Baldwin Park.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Baldwin Park or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Baldwin Park.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Baldwin Park versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Baldwin Park may include: La-Puente, Montclair, and Norwalk.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z