Compare-Cities.com
Compare Baldwin Park to San Bruno
This post compares Baldwin Park, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Baldwin Park (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,572 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $31,956 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $357,500 | $754,700 |
| White | 34% | 49% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 18% | 28% |
| With Kids | 48% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Baldwin Park or San Bruno?
A: Baldwin Park has a larger population count than San Bruno: 76572 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Baldwin Park or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Baldwin Park.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Baldwin Park or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Baldwin Park.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Baldwin Park versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Baldwin Park may include: La-Puente, Montclair, and Norwalk.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z