Compare-Cities.com
Compare Baldwin Park to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Baldwin Park, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Baldwin Park (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,572 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $31,956 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $357,500 | $633,400 |
| White | 34% | 75% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 18% | 13% |
| With Kids | 48% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Baldwin Park or Pleasant Hill?
A: Baldwin Park has a larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 76572 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Baldwin Park or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Baldwin Park.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Baldwin Park or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Baldwin Park.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Baldwin Park versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Baldwin Park may include: La-Puente, Montclair, and Norwalk.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z