Compare-Cities.com
Compare Baldwin Park to Pasadena
This post compares Baldwin Park, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Baldwin Park (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,572 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $31,956 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $357,500 | $689,700 |
| White | 34% | 53% |
| Black | 2% | 10% |
| Asian | 18% | 16% |
| With Kids | 48% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 37 |
| Rentals | 43% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Baldwin Park or Pasadena?
A: Baldwin Park has a smaller population count than Pasadena: 76572 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Baldwin Park or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Baldwin Park.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Baldwin Park or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Baldwin Park.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Baldwin Park versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Baldwin Park may include: La-Puente, Montclair, and Norwalk.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z