Compare-Cities.com
Compare Baldwin Park to Foster City
This post compares Baldwin Park, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Baldwin Park (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,572 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $31,956 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $357,500 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 34% | 43% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 18% | 47% |
| With Kids | 48% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Baldwin Park or Foster City?
A: Baldwin Park has a larger population count than Foster City: 76572 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Baldwin Park or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Baldwin Park.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Baldwin Park or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Baldwin Park.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Baldwin Park versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Baldwin Park may include: La-Puente, Montclair, and Norwalk.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z