Compare-Cities.com
Compare Baldwin Park to Bakersfield
This post compares Baldwin Park, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Baldwin Park (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,572 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $31,956 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $357,500 | $228,400 |
| White | 34% | 68% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 18% | 7% |
| With Kids | 48% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 30 |
| Rentals | 43% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Baldwin Park or Bakersfield?
A: Baldwin Park has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 76572 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Baldwin Park or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Baldwin Park.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Baldwin Park or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Baldwin Park.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Baldwin Park versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Baldwin Park may include: La-Puente, Montclair, and Norwalk.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z