Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to South San Francisco
This post compares Bakersfield, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 68% | 33% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 39% |
| With Kids | 45% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or South San Francisco?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than South San Francisco: 372680 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z