Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to South Pasadena
This post compares Bakersfield, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $928,500 |
| White | 68% | 54% |
| Black | 7% | 3% |
| Asian | 7% | 29% |
| With Kids | 45% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or South Pasadena?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 372680 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Bakersfield versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z