Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Sanger
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Sanger, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Sanger (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 24,883 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $35,793 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $178,900 |
| White | 68% | 77% |
| Black | 7% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 2% |
| With Kids | 45% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 43% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Sanger?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than Sanger: 372680 compared with 24883 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Sanger?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Sanger?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 42% for Sanger.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z