Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to San Francisco
This post compares Bakersfield, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $927,400 |
| White | 68% | 47% |
| Black | 7% | 5% |
| Asian | 7% | 34% |
| With Kids | 45% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
| Rentals | 43% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or San Francisco?
A: Bakersfield has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 372680 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Bakersfield versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z