Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to San Bruno
This post compares Bakersfield, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $754,700 |
| White | 68% | 49% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 28% |
| With Kids | 45% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or San Bruno?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 372680 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z