Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $444,200 |
| White | 68% | 62% |
| Black | 7% | 9% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 45% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 43% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Bakersfield has a larger population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 372680 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z