Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Foster City
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 68% | 43% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 47% |
| With Kids | 45% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Foster City?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than Foster City: 372680 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z