Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Foothill Farms
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 372,680 | 33,627 |
Income (median) | $44,447 | $39,925 |
Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $201,200 |
White | 68% | 67% |
Black | 7% | 9% |
Asian | 7% | 5% |
With Kids | 45% | 38% |
Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
Rentals | 43% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Foothill Farms?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than Foothill Farms: 372680 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z