Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Cudahy
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Cudahy, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Cudahy (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 372,680 | 24,146 |
Income (median) | $44,447 | $26,980 |
Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $327,500 |
White | 68% | 77% |
Black | 7% | 0% |
Asian | 7% | 0% |
With Kids | 45% | 60% |
Age (median) | 30 | 27 |
Rentals | 43% | 85% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Cudahy?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than Cudahy: 372680 compared with 24146 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Cudahy?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Cudahy?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Bakersfield versus 85% for Cudahy.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z