Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Corona
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Corona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 163,585 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $50,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $411,600 |
| White | 68% | 66% |
| Black | 7% | 5% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 45% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 43% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Corona?
A: Bakersfield has a larger population count than Corona: 372680 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Bakersfield versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z