Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Campbell
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Campbell, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Campbell (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 41,164 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $76,436 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $884,600 |
| White | 68% | 65% |
| Black | 7% | 3% |
| Asian | 7% | 18% |
| With Kids | 45% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 50% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Campbell?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than Campbell: 372680 compared with 41164 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Campbell?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Campbell?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Campbell does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 50% for Campbell.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z