Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Burbank
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $574,300 |
| White | 68% | 70% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 45% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Burbank?
A: Bakersfield has a larger population count than Burbank: 372680 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Bakersfield versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z