Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Beverly Hills
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 68% | 82% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 9% |
| With Kids | 45% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 43% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Beverly Hills?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than Beverly Hills: 372680 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Bakersfield versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z