Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Belmont
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 68% | 62% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 27% |
| With Kids | 45% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 43% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Belmont?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than Belmont: 372680 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z