Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bakersfield to Baldwin Park
This post compares Bakersfield, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bakersfield (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 372,680 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $44,447 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $228,400 | $357,500 |
| White | 68% | 34% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 18% |
| With Kids | 45% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 43% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bakersfield or Baldwin Park?
A: Bakersfield has a much larger population count than Baldwin Park: 372680 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bakersfield or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Bakersfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bakersfield or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Bakersfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 43% for Bakersfield versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bakersfield may include: Riverside, Fresno, and Chula-Vista.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z