Compare-Cities.com
Compare Azusa to South San Francisco
This post compares Azusa, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Azusa (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,029 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $36,825 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 45% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 12% | 39% |
| With Kids | 40% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 39 |
| Rentals | 47% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Azusa or South San Francisco?
A: Azusa has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 49029 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Azusa or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Azusa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Azusa or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Azusa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Azusa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 47% for Azusa versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Azusa may include: Montclair, Pomona, and Ontario.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z