Compare-Cities.com
Compare Azusa to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Azusa, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Azusa (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,029 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $36,825 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $374,600 |
| White | 45% | 81% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 12% | 3% |
| With Kids | 40% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 38 |
| Rentals | 47% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Azusa or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Azusa has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 49029 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Azusa or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Azusa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Azusa or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Azusa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 47% for Azusa versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Azusa may include: Montclair, Pomona, and Ontario.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z