Compare-Cities.com
Compare Azusa to Riverbank
This post compares Azusa, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Azusa (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,029 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $36,825 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $247,200 |
| White | 45% | 79% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 12% | 4% |
| With Kids | 40% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 32 |
| Rentals | 47% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Azusa or Riverbank?
A: Azusa has a larger population count than Riverbank: 49029 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Azusa or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Azusa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Azusa or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Azusa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Azusa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 47% for Azusa versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Azusa may include: Montclair, Pomona, and Ontario.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z