Compare-Cities.com
Compare Azusa to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Azusa, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Azusa (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,029 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $36,825 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $633,400 |
| White | 45% | 75% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 12% | 13% |
| With Kids | 40% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 39 |
| Rentals | 47% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Azusa or Pleasant Hill?
A: Azusa has a larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 49029 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Azusa or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Azusa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Azusa or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Azusa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Azusa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 47% for Azusa versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Azusa may include: Montclair, Pomona, and Ontario.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z