Compare-Cities.com
Compare Azusa to Foothill Farms
This post compares Azusa, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Azusa (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,029 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $36,825 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $201,200 |
| White | 45% | 67% |
| Black | 2% | 9% |
| Asian | 12% | 5% |
| With Kids | 40% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 33 |
| Rentals | 47% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Azusa or Foothill Farms?
A: Azusa has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 49029 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Azusa or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Azusa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Azusa or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Azusa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 47% for Azusa versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Azusa may include: Montclair, Pomona, and Ontario.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z