Compare-Cities.com
Compare Azusa to Bakersfield
This post compares Azusa, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Azusa (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 49,029 | 372,680 |
Income (median) | $36,825 | $44,447 |
Home Value (median) | $367,500 | $228,400 |
White | 45% | 68% |
Black | 2% | 7% |
Asian | 12% | 7% |
With Kids | 40% | 45% |
Age (median) | 29 | 30 |
Rentals | 47% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Azusa or Bakersfield?
A: Azusa has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 49029 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Azusa or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Azusa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Azusa or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Azusa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Azusa does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 47% for Azusa versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Azusa may include: Montclair, Pomona, and Ontario.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z