Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Atwater, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Atwater (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,118 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $35,415 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $322,800 |
| White | 58% | 36% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 48% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 49% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or South San Jose Hills?
A: Atwater has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 29118 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Atwater versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z