Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to South San Francisco
This post compares Atwater, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Atwater (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,118 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $35,415 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 58% | 33% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 48% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 49% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or South San Francisco?
A: Atwater has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 29118 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Atwater versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z