Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to San Bruno
This post compares Atwater, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Atwater (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,118 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $35,415 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $754,700 |
| White | 58% | 49% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 28% |
| With Kids | 48% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 49% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or San Bruno?
A: Atwater has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 29118 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Atwater versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z