Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to Riverbank
This post compares Atwater, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Atwater (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,118 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $35,415 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $247,200 |
| White | 58% | 79% |
| Black | 3% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 48% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 49% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or Riverbank?
A: Atwater has a similar population count than Riverbank: 29118 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Atwater versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z