Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to Redlands
This post compares Atwater, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Atwater (city) | Redlands (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,118 | 70,765 |
Income (median) | $35,415 | $54,151 |
Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $350,900 |
White | 58% | 71% |
Black | 3% | 7% |
Asian | 4% | 7% |
With Kids | 48% | 33% |
Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
Rentals | 49% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or Redlands?
A: Atwater has a much smaller population count than Redlands: 29118 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Atwater versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z