Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to Lancaster
This post compares Atwater, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Atwater (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,118 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $35,415 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $213,100 |
| White | 58% | 62% |
| Black | 3% | 21% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 48% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 49% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or Lancaster?
A: Atwater has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 29118 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Atwater versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z