Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to Lake Forest
This post compares Atwater, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Atwater (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,118 | 81,812 |
| Income (median) | $35,415 | $64,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $585,100 |
| White | 58% | 67% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 15% |
| With Kids | 48% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 49% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or Lake Forest?
A: Atwater has a much smaller population count than Lake Forest: 29118 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Atwater versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z