Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to Burbank
This post compares Atwater, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Atwater (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,118 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $35,415 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $574,300 |
| White | 58% | 70% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 48% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 49% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or Burbank?
A: Atwater has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 29118 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Atwater versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z