Compare-Cities.com
Compare Atwater to Beverly Hills
This post compares Atwater, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Atwater (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,118 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $35,415 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $179,400 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 58% | 82% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 9% |
| With Kids | 48% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 49% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Atwater or Beverly Hills?
A: Atwater has a similar population count than Beverly Hills: 29118 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Atwater or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Atwater.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Atwater or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Atwater.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Atwater versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Atwater may include: Lemoore, Los-Banos, and Colton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z