Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Ashland, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $322,800 |
| White | 44% | 36% |
| Black | 17% | 1% |
| Asian | 20% | 10% |
| With Kids | 42% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 68% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or South San Jose Hills?
A: Ashland has a similar population count than South San Jose Hills: 24477 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z