Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to South San Francisco
This post compares Ashland, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 44% | 33% |
| Black | 17% | 2% |
| Asian | 20% | 39% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 68% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or South San Francisco?
A: Ashland has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 24477 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z