Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ashland to South Pasadena
This post compares Ashland, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ashland (CDP) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,477 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $40,407 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $396,400 | $928,500 |
| White | 44% | 54% |
| Black | 17% | 3% |
| Asian | 20% | 29% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 68% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ashland or South Pasadena?
A: Ashland has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 24477 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ashland or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ashland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ashland or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ashland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Ashland versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ashland may include: San-Pablo, Bellflower, and Lawndale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z